Charity Lawyers
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Our team
  • Expertise
    • At a glance
    • In depth
      • Tax & duties
      • Governance
      • Charitable Trusts
      • Structures: establishment & restructuring
      • Mergers, collaborations & strategic alliances
      • Gifts, charitable fundraising & promotions
      • Disputes & regulatory reviews
      • Workplace & People issues
      • Brand, information & reputation protection
      • Property
  • Insights
    • At a glance
    • View articles
      • Breaking: Charities to lose charitable status if they fail to join the National Redress Scheme
      • New Bill – Requiring DGRs to Register as Charities
      • Federal Budget 2020-21
      • NZ High Court finds Greenpeace NZ should be registered as a charity
      • A member of a charity has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the charity?
      • Key Changes- incorporated associations in Queensland
      • COVID-19 Work practice changes to keep our commitments to our clients and team
      • Bill for new DGR category for Community Sheds now law
      • UPDATE 2 June 2020: SME Commercial Leasing Principles During COVID-19 - what does it mean for charities and not-for-profits?
      • UPDATE 19 May 2020: COVID-19 – Information for Charities and Not-for-Profits
      • UPDATE 6 May 2020: COVID-19 - Ancillary Funds, Disaster Relief Funds and AGM for companies
      • Draft bill for new DGR Category: Men’s and Women’s Sheds
      • An Update: COVID-19 Australian government’s economic response – What’s for charities and not-for-profits?
      • COVID-19 Australian government’s economic response – What’s for charities and not-for-profits?
      • ACNC to review registered charities beginning with Public Benevolent Institutions in July 2020
      • Government response to the recommendations of the ACNC Legislation Review
      • Fundraising– considerations for charities, fundraisers and donors
      • Minute-taking post Banking Royal Commission
      • Taxation Ruling: 'in Australia' conditions
      • Key changes to the Victorian Fundraising Act
      • Religious Discrimination Bill- Update
      • New protections for whistleblowers – what does it mean for charities and not-for-profits? UPDATE
      • Significant Changes in Payment and Record Keeping Requirements for Clerical and Administrative Staff
      • New Tax Office Ruling - Fringe Benefits Provided to Religious Practitioners
      • ACNC External Conduct Standards - Update
      • Fair Work Australia decision will introduce changes in entitlements and record keeping requirements of clerical and administrative employees
      • Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability
      • National Redress Scheme Update
      • DGR reform proposals
      • Release of the ACNC Review Report
      • Not So Casual
      • ACNC External Conduct Standards - Public Consultation
      • Law on Advocacy by Charities
      • New ATO Draft Ruling on the fringe benefits tax: benefits provided to religious practitioners
      • Employment update - New numbers for key employment issues for a new tax year
      • Electoral disclosure & funding reform: why charities and NFPs should be concerned
      • Review of ACNC Framework
      • Reforming Administration of Tax Deductible Gift Recipients - a victory for common sense?
      • Righting Wrongs: Victoria takes lead on organisational child abuse legislation
      • Tax Deductible Gift Recipient Reform Opportunities
      • When may a charity board member be paid for their services?
      • #fixfundraising
      • Privacy Law Update: Mandatory Data Breach Notifications to come into force by the end of 2017
      • Good Things Come To Those Who Wait? ACNC releases Commissioner’s Interpretation Statement on Public Benevolent Institutions
      • Privacy Obligations - Lessons and reminders from the Red Cross Data Breach
      • Charities and the Australian Consumer Law - reducing duplication and confusion
  • Careers
  • Contact

Get In Touch


Sydney

Level 4, 107 Mount Street
North Sydney NSW 2060
Australia

   +61 2 9466 5222

  info@prolegis.com.au

Melbourne

Suite 350, Level 3
1 Queens Road
Melbourne VIC 3004
Australia

   +61 3 8672 2920

  info@prolegis.com.au

Insights

A member of a charity has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the charity?

   July 2020   |  Insights   |  Jon Cheung and Seak-King Huang

On 29 July 2020, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom handed down its judgment in Lehtimäki and others v Cooper [2020] UKSC 33, which confirmed that members of charitable companies in the United Kingdom are fiduciaries and must therefore make decisions and act in the companies’ best interests (that is, to serve the purposes of the charities) to the exclusion of their own or any other party’s interests.

Background

The issues in Lehtimäki centered on a proposed $360 million grant from The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (‘CIFF’), a United Kingdom charitable company, to another charity, Big Win Philanthropy.  CIFF applied for judicial approval to make the grant.  This grant had to be approved by the members of CIFF. Dr. Mario Lehtimäki was the only member able to vote on the proposed grant.  At the center of the case were the questions about whether he could be ordered by the Court to vote in favor of the grant and how his vote should be exercised.  The matter was on appeal to the Supreme Court after decisions at the first instance in the High Court (Chancery Division) and a subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeal (Civil Division).

Decision

The Supreme Court’s decision was that:

  • Dr. Lehtimäki had a fiduciary duty as a member to act in the best interests of CIFF;
  • as a fiduciary, circumstances had arisen such that the court could exercise jurisdiction to intervene in the exercise of the discretion Dr. Lehtimäki had as a member; and
  • in the circumstances, the Court had power direct Dr. Lehtimäki to exercise his discretion in a particular way. 

In its unanimous decision, the Supreme Court described the relationship of Dr. Lehtimäki and CIFF as a “contract-and-statute-based model” as it arose from both the contract that is formed between a member and the company upon admission of the member to membership and UK company law.

While the circumstances that led to the case are unique, notably, the Supreme Court also indicated that the fiduciary relationship between charities and their members apply to charitable companies with small and large memberships.  

Implications for Australian charitable companies

In the Australian context, Lehtimäki could be persuasive in Australian courts for the view that a member of a company limited by guarantee (a very common legal structure for charities in Australia) should also be seen as a fiduciary who must act in the interest of the company to the exclusion of his or her own or a third party’s interest. 

However, as stated in Lehtimäki, ‘the precise circumstances in which the member of a charitable company has fiduciary duties in relation to the charitable purposes and the content of those duties will have to be worked out when they arise’.  That is to say, the duty is a subjective one.

There is logic to this where a charity is concerned because it is fundamental that a charity is ‘other focussed’ – a charity exists for its purposes, for the benefit of others rather than the charity or its members themselves.  Member rights (and certainly, member entitlements) are not charitable purposes. 

Already, responsible persons (directors and board members) of Australian registered charities have a duty to act in good faith in the charity’s best interests and to further the purposes of the registered charity.

Implications of these principles for Australian charitable companies include the considerations and conduct of members, particular when voting in a general meeting in respect of matters such as:

  • significant transactions and payments
  • property acquisitions and divestments
  • mergers and disaggregations
  • disputes resolution.

If you have any queries, please contact Jon Cheung or Seak-King Huang

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.





Quick Links

⇢    Our Team
⇢    About Us
⇢    Expertise
⇢    Insights
⇢    ACNC

Latest News

  • November 2020
    Breaking: Charities to lose charitable status if they fail to join the National Redress Scheme
  • October 2020
    New Bill – Requiring DGRs to Register as Charities
  • October 2020
    Federal Budget 2020-21
  • September 2020
    Bill for new DGR category for Community Sheds now law
  • August 2020
    NZ High Court finds Greenpeace NZ should be registered as a charity

Latest News & Insights

  • Breaking: Charities to lose charitable status if they fail to join the National Redress Scheme November 2020
  • New Bill – Requiring DGRs to Register as Charities October 2020
  • Federal Budget 2020-21 October 2020

Useful Links

  • Our Team
  • About Us
  • Expertise
  • Insights
  • ACNC

Sydney Office

Level 4, 107 Mount Street
North Sydney  NSW   2060
Australia

+61 2 9466 5222

info@prolegis.com.au

Melbourne Office

Suite 350, Level 3

1 Queens Road
Melbourne  VIC  3004
Australia

+61 3 8672 2920

info@prolegis.com.au

Copyright © Prolegis Lawyers. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy