Charity Lawyers
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Who we are
    • Our team
  • Expertise
    • At a glance
    • In depth
      • Tax & duties
      • Governance
      • Charitable Trusts
      • Structures: establishment & restructuring
      • Mergers, collaborations & strategic alliances
      • Gifts, charitable fundraising & promotions
      • Disputes & regulatory reviews
      • Workplace & People issues
      • Brand, information & reputation protection
      • Property
  • Insights
    • At a glance
    • View articles
      • Opportunities for Law Graduates/Solicitors
      • Related party transactions
      • Congratulations to our new Partner, Senior Associate, and two new Associates.
      • Congratulations to our new Partner, Sam Burnett
      • 2022 Budget: Good news for charities
      • Update on recent changes to the Corporations Act affecting members’ rights to elect to receive company documents
      • Updated transparency requirements under the Commonwealth Electoral Act
      • Pastoral care services DGR category
      • Resignation of director notification
      • Permanent changes to the Corporations Act regarding meetings and documents to come into force
      • Global Alliance of Impact Lawyers Launch Week
      • Prolegis Lawyers ranked Band 1 by Chambers
      • Recent changes to the Corporations Act for electronic meetings, notices, minute books and e-signing due to the Covid-19 pandemic
      • Recent decisions in Australian charity law – update
      • New requirements for DGRs to be registered as charities with the ACNC
      • High Court rules on who is a Casual employee
      • Streamlining of regulation of charities undertaking fundraising in NSW
      • Changes to Charities’ Financial Reporting Obligations
      • Changes to Casual Employment
      • Women’s Life Centre – A recent decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal regarding Public Benevolent Institutions (PBIs)
      • Final Report of the 2020 Review of Disability Standards for Education 2005
      • Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety - final report released
      • UPDATE 25 February 2021: Introducing ACNC Governance Standard 6 and changes to Basic Religious Charity eligibility
      • Treasury Consultation: Proposed changes to ACNC Governance Standard 3
      • Breaking: Charities to lose charitable status if they fail to join the National Redress Scheme
      • New Bill – Requiring DGRs to Register as Charities
      • Federal Budget 2020-21
      • NZ High Court finds Greenpeace NZ should be registered as a charity
      • A member of a charity has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the charity?
      • Key Changes- incorporated associations in Queensland
      • Bill for new DGR category for Community Sheds now law
      • UPDATE 2 June 2020: SME Commercial Leasing Principles During COVID-19 - what does it mean for charities and not-for-profits?
      • Draft bill for new DGR Category: Men’s and Women’s Sheds
      • ACNC to review registered charities beginning with Public Benevolent Institutions in July 2020
      • Government response to the recommendations of the ACNC Legislation Review
      • Fundraising– considerations for charities, fundraisers and donors
      • Minute-taking post Banking Royal Commission
      • Taxation Ruling: 'in Australia' conditions
      • Key changes to the Victorian Fundraising Act
      • Religious Discrimination Bill- Update
      • New protections for whistleblowers – what does it mean for charities and not-for-profits? UPDATE
      • Significant Changes in Payment and Record Keeping Requirements for Clerical and Administrative Staff
      • New Tax Office Ruling - Fringe Benefits Provided to Religious Practitioners
      • ACNC External Conduct Standards - Update
      • Fair Work Australia decision will introduce changes in entitlements and record keeping requirements of clerical and administrative employees
      • Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability
      • National Redress Scheme Update
      • DGR reform proposals
      • Release of the ACNC Review Report
      • Not So Casual
      • ACNC External Conduct Standards - Public Consultation
      • Law on Advocacy by Charities
      • New ATO Draft Ruling on the fringe benefits tax: benefits provided to religious practitioners
      • Employment update - New numbers for key employment issues for a new tax year
      • Electoral disclosure & funding reform: why charities and NFPs should be concerned
      • Review of ACNC Framework
      • Reforming Administration of Tax Deductible Gift Recipients - a victory for common sense?
      • Righting Wrongs: Victoria takes lead on organisational child abuse legislation
      • Tax Deductible Gift Recipient Reform Opportunities
      • When may a charity board member be paid for their services?
      • #fixfundraising
      • Privacy Law Update: Mandatory Data Breach Notifications to come into force by the end of 2017
      • Good Things Come To Those Who Wait? ACNC releases Commissioner’s Interpretation Statement on Public Benevolent Institutions
      • Charities and the Australian Consumer Law - reducing duplication and confusion
  • Careers
  • Contact

Get In Touch


Sydney

Level 4, 107 Mount Street
North Sydney NSW 2060
Australia

   +61 2 9466 5222

  info@prolegis.com.au

Melbourne

Level 12
500 Collins Street
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia

   +61 3 8672 2920

  info@prolegis.com.au

Insights

#fixfundraising

   April 2017   |  Opinion   |  

Last week, we saw charities and sector leaders and advisors write an open letter to our Prime Minister, Premiers and Chief Ministers imploring them to #fixfundraising. Their letter calls for the creation of one uniform fundraising regulatory regime as part of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Prolegis fully supports this proposed reform, whilst also identifying a number of practical and policy issues that will require attention so that no unintended consequences arise for the charity and not for profit sector.

Prolegis fully supports major reform to our States and Territories’ existing laws around fundraising. These laws are outdated and often contradictory. They have neither kept up with, nor efficiently regulate, the fundraising practices we commonly see today. These practices include Australia-wide fundraising, peer-to-peer fundraising by individuals reaching out to their own networks and, business to customer fundraising, where businesses fundraise as they sell products and services for causes they have chosen to support, much of which now takes place on the web. In this opinion piece we highlight areas of concern with the existing laws and identify some of the questions that will need to be considered in adopting one uniform regulatory regime under the ACL.

As a dedicated team of practitioners serving the charity and not-for-profit sector, the need to have a single, clear set of laws and regulations that govern fundraising activities for this sector is obvious to us. The following common questions that are often asked by charities and not-for-profits, as well as businesses and individuals undertake fundraising for them, whether commercially or otherwise, illustrate the need:

  • Which of the State/Territory based fundraising laws apply when you are operating nationally? To what extent do they overlap with each other?
  • How do we comply with one regime and also with another when they may be in conflict with each other?
  • What fundraising activities do permits and licences actually cover in each jurisdiction?
  • Does the ACL already apply?  When does it apply? Over what sort of activities?

We agree that utilising the ACL is possible and sensible given the focus of fundraising regulation is also predominantly on the protection of consumers (the ultimate donors).  At the launch event, the Shadow Minister for Charities and Not-for-Profits Andrew Leigh spoke of “dodgy charities” as significant threats to charitable giving by Australians.

There are however, some important matters that will need to be addressed before the ACL can fully ‘inherit’ regulation of fundraising across Australia.

The first matter is constitutional.

The ACL is Commonwealth legislation made on the basis of the Commonwealth’s powers under Section 51 of our Constitution, a provision which does not provide a head of power sufficient to cover the fundraising activities other than those which are conducted “in trade or commerce”.  So, the question of whether this issue can be dealt with by a few simple changes to wording in the ACL, or whether an inter-governmental approach (in which contribution of effort and resources by all jurisdictions would be essential) may be necessary, turns on determining whether all forms of fundraising occur “in trade or commerce”.

The Federal Court decision concerning Belle Gibson is still topical. She was found to have contravened the prohibitions in the ACL for conduct that is, or is likely to be, misleading or deceptive and unconscionable conduct in connection with goods or services. In her case, it is easy to conclude that she was engaged in trade or commerce because she promoted and sold books and apps.  But this will not, and perhaps should not, be the case for all fundraising activities.  

Section 2 of the ACL defines “trade or commerce” to include “any business or professional activity (whether or not carried on for profit)”.  This has led some to conclude that that the ACL already applies to all fundraising activities carried on by charities and not-for-profit organisations or those engaged by them.  But is this so?  And should every party involved in the chain of a transaction be caught?

The following scenario may be useful in illustrating the potential uncertainty about whether the ACL would, and should, apply to all fundraising efforts. Consider a vendor who sells tokens with the sale proceeds being directed to a charity.  The activity of selling a token might lead one to a quick conclusion that the vendor is engaged in trade or commerce – there is a business activity carried on.  However, the following questions highlight some of the issues involved in forming a definitive view about whether or not the ACL might apply:

  • Would or should the conclusion be different if the vendor is an unpaid volunteer   Does an unpaid volunteer carry on a business or professional activity? Should a person who is a volunteer be subject to this sort of regulation?  If the conclusion is that volunteers should be exempt, are all of them to be exempt?
  • What if the vendor is a personnel of a direct marketing company?  Is the direct marketing company caught?  Should the vendor be caught also?
  • Is the charity which receives the proceeds also engaged in the trade or commerce activity of selling the tokens?  And would the answer to that question be different if, on the one hand, the charity had engaged the vendor or the direct marketing company (say, as part of an overall campaign organised by the charity) to sell the tokens, or if, on the other hand, the vendor is an individual selling tokens of their own initiative, fuelled by the desire to raise money for their favourite charity?

These questions illustrate the fact that the answer to the “trade or commerce” question is not be straightforward.

They also illustrate that there are policy considerations that we should take into account in considering who should be subject to the ACL prohibitions.  Many different types of organisations and their activities currently enjoy exemptions from some or all fundraising regulation.  An important policy question is whether these exemptions are to be mirrored in an ACL which becomes the singular uniform law relating to fundraising.

The second consideration is how the current system of fundraising licences and permits, and requirements around matters such as identification, could be streamlined. 

Currently, licences and permits, and identification badges, do serve to give the general public some confidence that the fundraising solicitations which may come their way are sanctioned.  If the current State and Territory legislation are repealed, would the ACCC take on the role of administering and regulating licences and permits?  Could the ACL contain the requirements around identification?

There are clear economic benefits in a harmonised approach to the legal regulation of charitable fundraising.  The Commonwealth and the State and Territory governments constantly seek to reduce red tape for organisations in their jurisdictions, and there is a clear public benefit to simplifying and eradicating laws that are costly in terms of compliance and which are out-of-date.  We believe that the Federal and State/Territory governments should cooperate to bring about these much needed reforms, and that given the magnitude of the contribution this sector makes to Australia’s economy, these reforms should be prioritised.

Prolegis would be delighted to add its experience to the development of these reforms. 





Quick Links

⇢    Our Team
⇢    About Us
⇢    Expertise
⇢    Insights
⇢    ACNC

Latest News

  • October 2023
    Opportunities for Law Graduates/Solicitors
  • August 2023
    Related party transactions
  • July 2023
    Congratulations to our new Partner, Senior Associate, and two new Associates.
  • April 2023
    Congratulations to our new Partner, Sam Burnett
  • October 2022
    2022 Budget: Good news for charities

Latest News & Insights

  • Opportunities for Law Graduates/Solicitors October 2023
  • Related party transactions August 2023
  • Congratulations to our new Partner, Senior Associate, and two new Associates. July 2023

Useful Links

  • Our Team
  • About Us
  • Expertise
  • Insights
  • ACNC

Sydney Office

Level 4, 107 Mount Street
North Sydney  NSW   2060
Australia

+61 2 9466 5222

info@prolegis.com.au

Melbourne Office

Level 12

500 Collins Street
Melbourne  VIC  3000
Australia

+61 3 8672 2920

info@prolegis.com.au

Copyright © Prolegis Lawyers. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy